Buy the Panic or Buy Every Month? What 20 Years of Data Says

Waiting for a crash to deploy cash sounds smart. A Schwab study and a look at Larry Williams' VIX FIX suggest the wait may cost more than the discount pays.

1. Even a perfect bottom-picker barely beat the average investor

How much could you make if you knew exactly where the market bottomed?

Charles Schwab ran an interesting experiment. It gave five hypothetical investors $2,000 at the start of each year from 2005 through 2024 and varied only when they invested.

One bought on the lowest day of each year. Another invested on the first trading day of every year with no analysis. Another spread purchases evenly over 12 months.

Here is how they finished.

Final wealth after 20 years

StrategyFinal value
Perfect bottom$186,077
Invest on day one of the year$170,555
Monthly installments$166,591
Worst timing (buy the peak)$151,343
Wait in cash$47,357

Hypothetical portfolio tracking the S&P 500. $2,000 invested per year, 2005 to 2024. Source: Charles Schwab (2025).

The surprise is not the winner. It is that the gap between someone who called the bottom correctly every year for 20 years and someone who simply invested on the first day of each year was $15,522, about 9.1% of final wealth.

A 9.1% edge is not trivial. But it requires perfect timing 20 years in a row.

The investor who bought at the high every single year is more striking still. That person ended with $151,343. Despite picking the wrong moment every time, they accumulated far more than the investor who stayed in cash equivalents and kept delaying.

Schwab also analyzed 80 rolling 20-year periods starting in 1926. In 70 of them, the ranking was identical: perfect timing, immediate investing, monthly investing, worst timing, then cash.

One caveat. These results assume the money is ready at the start of each year. That is not the same as saying someone who earns a paycheck each month can invest a full year's savings in January.

2. What about using VIX FIX to target only the fear zones?

Larry Williams' Williams VIX FIX is a technical indicator that measures market fear through price.

It calculates, as a percentage, how far the day's low sits below the highest close of the past 22 trading days. A sharp rise means downside pressure has intensified relative to recent price action.

Chris Moody's widely used variant adds Bollinger Bands and percentile thresholds from past periods to flag extreme declines.

An important distinction applies here.

VIX FIX measures fear-driven price declines. It does not confirm that a bottom is in.

In a market that rebounds right after a sharp drop, it can look like an effective signal. But in an earnings downturn, a financial crisis or a long valuation reset, prices can keep falling after the first signal.

None of this means VIX FIX is useless. A good fear detector and a proven excess-return strategy are different things.

3. What does $1,000-a-month investing become in 20 years?

The example below uses a monthly contribution of 1 million won.

Assume a 10% annual return compounded evenly each month. Investing 1 million won at the end of each month for 240 months puts in 240 million won in principal and ends with about 718.26 million won.

Amount
Total principal invested240 million won
Assumed value after 20 years718 million won

10% effective annual return, end-of-month contributions, excluding taxes and fees. A mathematical illustration with a fixed assumed return, not a backtest on an actual index.

So the question comes down to this. Is it better to invest every month, or to hold some cash and deploy it in a crash?

The core of that question is likely not how low a price you buy at, but how much of the market's rise you give up while waiting for a low price.

4. Three reasons fear buying is not always superior

First, cash has a cost.

Say a stock rises from 100 to 140, then falls 20% to 112. The headline sounds frightening, but the price is still 12% above the entry price of someone who bought at 100. A percentage decline is not the same as a cheap price.

Second, regular buying adjusts quantity automatically.

Invest the same amount each month and you buy 10 shares when an ETF costs 10 units and 20 shares when it costs 5. You pick up more shares in a falling market without judging the bottom. This may lower your average cost. It does not guarantee against losses or promise outperformance versus the market.

Third, people tend not to invest on the day fear is highest.

While building cash, everyone says they are waiting for a crash. When it arrives, the reasons are right in front of them: recession, corporate defaults, risk to the financial system. Worry that prices will fall further makes it easy to delay deploying the cash.

For a fear-buying strategy to work, then, a good indicator is not enough. The investor also has to follow a set rule even when the signal turns out to be wrong.

Even nailing the market bottom 20 years in a row beat investing on the first trading day by only 9.1%, and the gains missed while waiting are likely the bigger cost.

Sungdong KimAuthor of the Korean book “The US Stock ETF Investing That Never Fails”. A long-term investor in U.S. stocks since 2019.

More by topic

Starting with this story's topics, then what readers are following now

Investor psychology, decision-making and books on investing

S&P 500

This story's topic9 storiesSee all →

A building that houses servers and networking gear and supplies them with powe…

US AI Data Centers Are Headed for 90GW. Gigawatts Now Matter More Than Dollars

Goldman Sachs expects US data center capacity to grow from 64GW at the end of 2026 to 90GW at the end of 2027. The AI race is moving from buying GPUs to building power plants and transmission lines alongside them.

Tech

Tesla Energy's 13.7GWh Paradox: Expectations Ran Faster Than Deployments

Q2 deployments recovered but margins collapsed. Q3 set a record for deployments and still missed estimates. The issue is not the size of AI power demand but how fast it converts into Tesla revenue and profit.

Tech

Why the White House Swapped "AI" for "Super Intelligence"

Executive Order 14434 renames AI across the federal government without defining a new technology. The real story is about roughly $700 billion in capex, free cash flow and electricity.

Tech

Why Nvidia Is Happy to Help Make AI Models Nearly Free

Falling model prices can squeeze model makers. For Nvidia, the number that matters is the total volume of tokens generated worldwide and the compute that produces them.

Tech

Nvidia Put $2 Billion Into Lumentum. Optics May Be the Next Bottleneck, but the Stock Has Already Run

Optical networking is emerging as the next constraint on AI data centers. Investors need to separate the industry's growth potential from the price they are already paying for it.

Tech

Nvidia's Next Target After GPUs: Controlling What AI Agents Are Allowed to Do

OpenShell and Sentry are not about policing what an AI says. They are about controlling, at the server infrastructure level, which files and APIs an AI can touch, what it can execute, and who can actually pull the plug when something goes wrong.

Tech

AI Needs to Find $1 Trillion a Year From Somewhere to Pay Back Its Capex

Saying AI capex is big is no longer the point. The harder question is what end users have to pay for the buildout to pencil out, and Goldman Sachs puts that number at roughly $1 trillion a year.

Tech

HBM

63 storiesSee all →

Memory stacked next to the GPU.

Has Memory Peaked? Prices Are Cooling, but the Shortage Looks Set to Run to 2028

Price growth has slowed and consumer demand is already breaking. Server and HBM supply remains short, and Micron says more than 75% of its 2027 volume is already committed to customers.

Tech

AI Chip Peak Check: Demand Still Rising, Risk Building in 2027-2029 Supply and Funding

DRAM and NAND contract prices are still climbing and HBM suppliers hold the edge. Power shortages, AI financing costs and simultaneous memory expansion are the risks for later years.

Investing

How Far Can China Push DRAM Without EUV

CXMT says it has shrunk DRAM features to 11.95nm using quadruple patterning instead of EUV lithography. The real question is not whether China caught up, but how much more it now costs China to get there.

Tech

Memory Chip Supercycle: Not at Peak Yet, But 5 of 6 Warning Signs Are Flashing

Memory prices are still climbing, but the pace is slowing and PC and smartphone demand is starting to crack under the weight of higher chip costs. This looks less like a price peak and more like a profit plateau building toward the next supply cycle.

Investing

The Real ASML Number Isn't the 3% Pop, It's the 30% Capacity Hike

ASML's rally isn't just an AI trade. Customers are already locking in 2027 tool slots, and ASML is raising Low-NA EUV capacity by roughly 30% to keep up.

Investing

2027 Isn't the End: Citi's Case for a Memory Supercycle Running to 2031

Citi says the memory shortage timeline is stretching again. If AI shifts from "train once" models to continual learning, HBM, server DRAM and enterprise SSDs could all fall short at the same time.

Tech

Samsung, SK Hynix Sold Off on AI Fears. The Orders Haven't Followed Yet

The selloff reflects a market recalculating AI capex speed and memory earnings expectations, not confirmed cancellations. So far, the data show a gap between fear and reality.

Investing

NVDA

75 storiesSee all →

The US-China Summit Didn't Erase Taiwan Risk for Chip Stocks

Washington's Taiwan policy held, but roughly $14 billion in arms sales is still on hold. For AI chip investors, the summit reads less like risk removed and more like a fragile balance extended.

Macro

Nvidia's $500 Billion Experiment: Wall Street Asks Who Backs the GPU, Not Just the Chip

The real issue in Nvidia's financing platform is not chip sales. It is how far Wall Street will trust GPU resale prices and rental income three to four years out.

Tech

The AI Bubble Question Has Changed: By Late 2026, It's ROIC Over GPUs

There is no sign yet that AI investment is slowing. If anything, hyperscaler spending forecasts keep climbing. But as the scale of that capital has grown, the market's question has shifted from "is AI growing" to "when, and how much, does this capital come back as cash."

Tech

2027 Investing Needs Alignment, Not Prediction

A new investing book argues the hard part was never picking the next winner. It's staying aligned with where value and bottlenecks are moving while keeping old human weaknesses in check.

Investor Mind

What Jensen Huang sold at the G20 was not GPUs. It was national infrastructure

Nvidia's message is that AI should be laid down like electricity, roads and the internet. After the hyperscalers, the buyers are governments, telcos, regional clouds and industrial data centers.

Tech

ASML Is Discussing 2030 Orders. How Long Can the AI Chip Supercycle Last?

Despite bubble worries, ASML sees equipment shortages through 2028. Investors should watch future production capacity, not just today's orders.

Tech

Nvidia and AMD Back Common Design to Build AI Data Centers Like Lego Blocks

A new Open Compute Project spec aims to let one building host rival chip systems. Whether it speeds up construction is not yet confirmed.

Tech